Raheem Kassam

KASSAM’S COUNTERPOINT: Tommy Is Bigger Than Party Politics

I DON’T think anyone is truly of the belief that Nigel Farage and Gerard Batten don’t have the same goals in common. The differences are tiny, and come down to strategy rather than philosophy.

Most of you will know that over the summer I was one of a small team of people who organised and fundraised for the #FreeTommy rallies.

I also was a media spokesman for the campaign, and spoke with him and/or his family almost every day. I still do.

Nick Ullman

But many who follow closely also know I’ve long said, and long said to Tommy that party politics was beneath him. He has proven himself a highly effective citizen journalist, campaigner, and activist. I don’t want him to lose those skills nor waste them by becoming a part of a bureaucratic organisation.

There’s a lot to think about when considering UKIP and Tommy joining forces, and I’ve had the opportunity over several years to give them significant thought.

The issue first arose for me, publicly, over two years ago. Sky News asked me if I would have Tommy Robinson in a UKIP under my prospective leadership. I said I wouldn’t. Before the interview I had spoken with Tommy about the issue, and he said very much what I believe to still be the case: that party politics should not be of interest to him.

Now I understand that has changed from his perspective. It hasn’t from mine, and I’ll tell you exactly why.

Running a political party, even being senior within a political party requires a collective responsibility. It means you all have to pull in the same direction on manifesto writing, fundraising, campaign pledges, publicity, events, membership, messaging, leafleting, and more.

Do we really want to see Tommy wasting his time delivering leaflets? Does he himself really want to have to be held to certain manifesto commitments of UKIP? Education policies? NHS policies? Foreign policy? I highly doubt it. It was uncomfortable enough for someone like me back in 2015. He is his own man and needs to be able to continue that way.

Furthermore, flip the conversation around. Does UKIP, or should UKIP be held to everything Tommy says or does? High profile figures in political parties are scrutinised incredibly heavily. Journalists and opposition parties watch their every move. Track their finances. Monitor who they are meeting, why, and what is discussed. I don’t think UKIP should have to answer for Tommy, much as I believe Tommy would dislike having to answer for UKIP.

Now let me bring something else into the equation: political strategy.

Over the past few months Gerard Batten has publicly denounced Steve Bannon and Donald Trump. These are two people who could have been very good for UKIP to work with. Instead, Batten has said he is “not a big admirer” of Bannon, and has said of Donald Trump, “I think it is sad state of affairs that Trump is a serious contender for the American Presidency” and that “it was hard to take seriously anyone with a hairstyle like that”.

If we think our movement could develop any long-standing ties to the American right (which we really should be doing) under Gerard Batten, we are gravely mistaken.

This shouldn’t be viewed as an attack on Mr. Batten, either.

I invited him, repeatedly, to be a part of the #FreeTommy rallies. I’ve known him for years, and on the policies we are scarcely different. But he is wrong on the strategy.

He told the BBC today that under him, UKIP was up to 8 per cent in the polls. Well actually that one was Opinium poll. Others have UKIP down at 3, 4, 5, and 7,  respectively. An average of these five polls puts UKIP at around 5 per cent, with a couple of points margin of error either way.

Why does this matter?

Because you would think that a party that has been as high as 20-odd per cent could capitalise on this Tory stitch up, fake Brexit deal. But under Gerard it hasn’t.

I also believe Gerard has succeeded in keeping UKIP from bankruptcy as he told the BBC earlier today. But that is neither here nor there, because the means by which it has happened means UKIP now operates on a skeleton staff, without a proper office, and without the means by which to fight a general election. So yeah, if I didn’t eat breakfast, lunch, or dinner, I’d be considerably better off, too.

In closing, I thought I’d let you know that I don’t say anything in public that I haven’t already made my feelings clear about in private. I’ve told Tommy how I feel about him becoming a party figure. I’ve told Nigel he was wrong not to support the #FreeTommy movement. I’ve told Gerard I was disappointed in his comments about Bannon.

And now I’m telling you what a mistake it would be to lose Tommy as a journalistic and campaigning force.

He has the opportunity to build a major media challenger to the establishment. I’d rather than doesn’t get lost in day-long National Executive Committee meetings, or in developing manifesto pledges.

I don’t expect you to agree with me, but I do believe this to be the most eminently reasonable and well thought through position.


Leave your vote

0 points
Upvote Downvote

Total votes: 0

Upvotes: 0

Upvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Downvotes: 0

Downvotes percentage: 0.000000%



  1. jim R

    November 24, 2018 at 11:00

    Although I have a great deal of respect Raheem and his abilities, I found this article to be wanting , and not just because it is repeated and you have to go through what seems like interminable adverts taking you away from the comments field.

    Raheem talks of Gerard denouncing over the past couple of months Bannon and Trump allegedly saying of the latter that he is a poor candidate for the presidency. Trump has been president for 2 years now,have you not noticed that? Maybe in the past Gerard thought that of Trump like many others including me, but have come to change their mind. I don’t know about Gerard saying anything recently about Bannon but not being a big admirer is hardly ground shaking, but he may have changed about that too.

    Raheem claims to be in almost constant communication with Tommy but does not offer a single thing about what Tommy’s ideas about joining Ukip are.

    Gerard talked about the 8% polling figure, why would he talk about any lower figure. That’s not a fault it makes sense.

    Raheem also takes Gerard to task for not capitalising on the 20% polling but that was torpedoed by Farage and the ship was just going under at 1.8% when Gerard plugged the hole. None of the other useless ones did anything in the intervening period other than to drag the Party down, Gerard stopped and reversed that.

    Gerard saved the Party but now has to operate within a sustainable budget, and Raheem seems to be taking Gerard to task for that. What else is he expected to do?

    So Raheem instead of asking us to contribute to Patreon, not necessarily a bad thing but just one of many similar requests and everyone cannot support every single one, tell us what you and Bannon are up to and how the effort to build a united challenge is going?

  2. Philip

    November 24, 2018 at 17:55

    I have to say that this article has given me pause for thought. Fair play Raheem, you always keep things fresh.

  3. Firdaus

    November 25, 2018 at 16:30

    Is it possible that with people thoroughly sick of political parties, a loose and informal slate of independents, under a common banner, could get elected? Make a virtue out of what seems to be the necessity of squabbling like cats in a bag. It worked, just about, in the referendum. And if the squabbling continued into government and nothing got done, at least nothing got wrecked either.

  4. Damaris Tighe

    November 28, 2018 at 16:31

    I think you’re exactly right Raheem. I’d come to this conclusion independently.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To Top

Forgot your password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.


Processing files…